Talk:Iron nanoparticle

Topic and scope

The introduction doesn't match the title —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.137.243 (talk)

The article doesn't cover the applications, production or very much else about nanoscale iron particles. These are widely used in medical and laboratory applications. The article needs to be expanded or simply replaced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.99.61 (talk)

Yeah, it reads as a self-contained essay on one specific application of the the topic and specifically (and almost only) as a review of the work of one person in that realm rather than an encyclopedia entry on the topic itself. Undue weight/minutiae focus and primarily primary-sourced for the content that is actually on the main topic. I'm almost tempted to brutally stub it down so we can get going on a better article on this important material. DMacks (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I removed the off-topic info/fluff & consolidated the remaining useful info. Feel free to further modify it as you see fit. --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Naturally occurring iron nanospheres

unfortunate that the article is written purely from a synthesis perspective when nanoparticles have been found naturally occuring in antarctic waters (blood falls). 50.68.33.141 (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

All it takes is an editor with a reference and a few minutes to write it. Why not give it a try? DMacks (talk) 01:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)