| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Irregular galaxy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Merge 2004
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This article should be merged with Irr-I galaxy and Irr-II galaxy. Since none of the other galaxies have been split into their Hubble sequence subtypes, and irregular galaxies are a less viewed subject, and that both Irr-I and Irr-II are substubs, and so is irregular galaxy, that there doesn't need to be three articles with no content. Just one article should do, this one, with some expansion.
132.205.15.4 20:18, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge 2008
editShould Be Merged With Peculiar galaxy --Witheld (talk) 23:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, peculiar galaxies are not always irregular galaxies, a merge would be incorrect. 76.66.193.90 (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed, my understanding is that there two separate entities. What *should* be done though is that both articles should be expanded in order to make this point more clear. Captmondo (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)