This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
@Theanswertolifetheuniverseandeverything: Holding a copy of the photograph does not have anything to do with copyright. It just means that there is one in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art - it might be on display, or in a storeroom. Copyright literally means "the right to make copies", and for most photographs, the copyright lies with the person who pressed the shutter release on the camera. Now in this case, the photographer was Robert Howlett, who died in 1858; I don't know of anywhere that the copyright lasts for longer than life plus 100 years, so the copyright expired in 1958. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply