Talk:Ischemic cascade
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I
editI don't know about the ischemic cascade in other tissues like the heart, so i limited this page to brain. If you know about other tissues, maybe you could add that in here, but i think a better idea would be to make this page be "Ischemic cascade in the brain" and make another page about the cascade other tissues. because the process in neural tissue is so different from other tissues, eg with anoxic depolarization. --Delldot 21:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Pretty much the same thing happens in all aerobic tissues. I have changed the article to reflect this. BTW, good review. Pproctor 14:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Numbering
editSomeone recently changed the bullet points to numbers. [1] I'd suggest changing it back, since the numbers might imply that the events are sequential; rather, many are concurrent or circular. Would anyone object to changing it back? delldot | talk 23:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
NXY-059
editI removed this last part from the article
However, NXY-059, the disulfonate derivative of the radical-scavenging spintrap phenylbutylnitrone, has been reported to give neuroprotection in Phase III human trials.<ref name="lees">Kennedy R. Lees, Justin A. Zivin, Tim Ashwood, Antonio Davalos, Stephen M. Davis, Hans-Christoph Diener, James Grotta, Patrick Lyden, Ashfaq Shuaib, Hans-Göran Hårdemark, Warren W. Wasiewski, for the Stroke–Acute Ischemic NXY Treatment (SAINT I) Trial Investigators. 2006. [http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/354/6/588 NXY-059 for Acute Ischemic Stroke.] ''New England Journal of Medicine''. Volume 354, Pages 588-600. Retrieved on [[January 9]], [[2007]].</ref>
According to a more recent study, NXY-059 is not efficient.
...however, the repeat study,found no difference between treated and placebo control groups on the same outcome measure (Hill, 2007; Shuaib et al., 2007). AstraZeneca has subsequently withdrawn NXY-059 from further development. Ref: Savitz, S.I.; A critical appraisal of the NXY-059 neuroprotection studies for acute stroke: A need for more rigorous testing of neuroprotective agents in animal models of stroke, Experimental Neurology 205 (2007) 20–25
Bobsodium (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks much for catching that! delldot talk 03:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
CoQ10
editIt is my understanding that CoQ10 offers some protection during an ischemic cascade, but I don't have any references for this. Presumably PQQ and other mitochondrial factors might as well... 67.198.37.16 (talk) 17:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ischemic cascade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050710080912/http://www.med.uiuc.edu/m2/Pathology/DCL.htm to http://www.med.uiuc.edu/m2/Pathology/DCL.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)