Talk:Ishim (river)

Rivers High‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs a map.

Russia: Physical geography Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Central Asia: Kazakhstan Low‑importance

	Asia portal Ishim (river) is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kazakhstan (assessed as Low-importance).

Old talk

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Lake-like expanse? Not really; although the river has been deepened and possibly widened a little, I don't think anyone who had actually seen this area of the river for themselves would ever compare it to a lake. Can the term public beach be used when an entrance fee must be paid? I've not made any changes as I'm unsure on the exact meaning of 'lake-like expanse' and 'public beach' - if others want to consider and edit as necessary or advise, it'd be great. 88.204.215.149 (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Chris Merriman 25/06/2009Reply

I'm not sure what was meant by "lake-like" either, I'd say feel free to change it. "public" usually means government owned, not necessarily free. I think if it's a city owned beach calling it "public" would still be appropriate even if they charge a fee - though 'municipal beach' would be an even more exact term if that's the case. Kmusser (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removed lake-like, and finally created an account for myself. AntiSceptic (talk) 21:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC) AntiSceptic / Chris Merriman 27/06/2009 03:27Reply

Add topic