Talk:Isidore van Kinsbergen

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Reassessment
Good articleIsidore van Kinsbergen has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 21, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 16, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Isidore van Kinsbergen had to dig and to clean for four months before he could take the first picture of the 9th century Indonesian Buddhist monument of Borobudur (pictured) in 1873?
Current status: Good article

GA

edit

This article is now a Good article on the English Wikipedia. The only suggestions for improvements I have are:

  1. To include more Interwiki-links in the paragraphs and sentences
  2. Possibly to extent on his biography

However the article is still excellent as it is but could be made that little better with the above done! For everyone who has helped edit this article and put time into working on it - Excellent work!!!!!Tellyaddict 13:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I agree absolutely 100% with your improvement suggestions. The only problem with this person's biography is that his source is really rare. — Indon (reply) — 18:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Isidore van Kinsbergen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS):  
    • Lead could be longer
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    • The whole artcile relies on three sources, can no more be found?
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: