Talk:Islamic Association of Palestine

Semites

"As Palestinians are are speakers of Arabic, they are by definition Semites. Therefore, a pro-Palestinian organization is inherently incapable of being anti-Semitic."

I removed the above because it is amateurish - not that its incorrect, rather, find some real things to to with this article rather than just blow over and talk dumb... -PackardGoose

Front

The sentence "It is widely considered by the U.S. Government to be a front for Hamas in the United States" is badly qualified. Which of these is more correct:

• The U.S. government considers the IAP a front for Hamas in the United States
• The IAP is widely considered a front for Hamas in foreign countries, such as the United States
• The IAP is widely considered a front for Hamas by governments, such as that of the United States

I was gonna change it to the first one unilaterally, but I thought others who are more knowledgeable may prefer one of the other two. Tuf-Kat

This article is extremely biased toward Republican, conservative, thinking. The only source for this article is from a right-wing quarterly. Some of the editors are Fox News "analysts".

Agreed. the author in the source is quite extreme and doesn't cite his own sources for his claims. Should we say "alleged" Islamist group? The founders are still operating in respectable jobs today. BrotherSulayman (talk) 05:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Inactive

The IAP website is inactive and according to one source 1 has been for a couple of years. Is the organization defunct then? Jabbi 02:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Defunct, according to Comm Director at Chicago CAIR. (SEWilco 18:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC))

Sources

That's interesting. Most of the paragraphs were recently marked as being from an article in MEQ, although much of the article is from before the MEQ article. Did someone confuse a story with many facts with being the only possible source? See an article version comparison. (SEWilco 06:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC))

Put on necessary tags for dead links and unsourced info. Cleaned up some obvious POVs and updated some factoids. Still needs more mainstream sources and fewer from advocacy groups with questionable WP:RS. CarolMooreDC (talk) 01:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Edit

This last edit deleted sourced information, because of the editor's personal view that it is false. Please restore that information which was deleted that was sourced. --Epeefleche (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Islamic Association of Palestine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503035244/http://kyl.senate.gov/legis_center/subdocs/091003_epstein.pdf to http://kyl.senate.gov/legis_center/subdocs/091003_epstein.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Islamic Association of Palestine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017084809/http://www.kentlaw.iit.edu/Documents/Academic%20Programs/7CR/v4-2/rowe.pdf to http://www.kentlaw.iit.edu/Documents/Academic%20Programs/7CR/v4-2/rowe.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Biased AF

This article remains incredibly biased, working entirely off the works of either Matthew Levitt, a pro-israeli founder of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and a source from Georgetown which is actually debunking the conspiracy theory that every other islamic association in the country is a secret front for the Muslim Brotherhood.

User:Sawerchessread (talk) 22:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)