Talk:Islamic Revival in British India
(Redirected from Talk:Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Islamic Revival in British India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 15:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Islamic Revival in British India is the first major monograph dedicated to the institutional and intellectual history of the Deobandi movement? Source: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0019.xml
- Reviewed: exempt
5x expanded by Owais Al Qarni (talk). Self-nominated at 18:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Expansion is large enough and new enough, sourcing is good. No images except a fair use book cover. Hook is interesting, short enough, and sourced. Good work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Owais Al Qarni: What's the status on a QPQ review? ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti:, this nomination does not need a QPQ. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 16:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: It's my first DYK nom.–MinisterOfReligion (Talk) 16:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
@Owais Al Qarni: Approved! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Readding tick because DYK bot didn't pick it up above. Z1720 (talk) 02:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: It's my first DYK nom.–MinisterOfReligion (Talk) 16:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti:, this nomination does not need a QPQ. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 16:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Owais Al Qarni: What's the status on a QPQ review? ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I have added cleanup tags to the article, which need to be acted upon per WP:DYKCOMPLETE. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Seeing no substantial effort to address AirshipJungleman29's now two-week-old concerns beyond my own close-paraphrasing removal, I am rejecting this nomination. Sorry. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
