Talk:Islamic calligraphy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Islamic calligraphy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Islamic calligraphy was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 14, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2018 and 10 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bberivan12, Gilbertjoan, Brooksk32. Peer reviewers: Bberivan12, Gilbertjoan, Brooksk32.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Arabic calligraphy
editDeapite the two term are [not] the same term, the Arabic calligraphy page [does] not have enough content to differentiate it from the Islamic calligraphy page, and it attracted all the interlanguage link to the page which might made people from other language Wikipedia wishing to find more information on the English Wikipedia fail to find what they want. C933103 (talk) 13:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous discussion. --Makeandtoss (talk) 13:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous discussion, just closed. Change the iw link (difficult these days I know). Johnbod (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous discussion. The topics are clearly distinct as we all stated then. That the other page is not yet very well developed is not the point: it stands for a substantial body of material, with any number of good, reliable sources attesting to the importance of that subject. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Closing this now, and updated the IW link. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Islamic calligraphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110228232705/http://www.mastersofistanbul.com/en/ustalar/2/calligraphy to http://www.mastersofistanbul.com/en/ustalar/2/calligraphy
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Adding information about a new invented script
edit"A new script of Islamic Calligraphy namely Khat e Ra’ana[46] (خطِ رعنا) invented first time by master Islamic calligrapher Mr. Ibn-e-Kaleem Ahsan Nizami[47] (ابن کلیم احسن نظامی) after the period of seven hundred years of Khat e Nast’aliq’s invention, which is a distinguishing addition in Islamic Arts & Calligraphy. It is a unique yet modern script among the earlier six officially authorized scripts."
Yesterday I have added above cited information in the article but unfortunately Mr Freshacconci reverted it, although I have cited some articles as well as links about the information is correct. I'm new to English wiki, it is requested to kindly help me add this information in any way possible.
Thanks
Regards MubasherKaleem (talk) 15:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- The evolution of Islamic calligraphy is characterised by the continual modification of existing scripts, the invention of new scripts and the abandonment of old scripts often to see them resurrected some decades later. The invention of new scripts, of itself, is not notable. Rather it is normal. It would be important to establish why the script developed Ibn-e-Kaleem Ahsan Nizami is especially notable. BronHiggs (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Invention of a new script in Arabic calligraphy is not as easy as in English language / Calligraphy therefore inventing of an Arabic language / calligraphic script is it self notable. In Arabic script it took seven centuries to invent a new script. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MubasherKaleem (talk • contribs) 11:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[Wiki Ed Assignment]
editHi there Wikipedians! I am editing this page along with two of my peers as a project for my Islamic art history class at university. So far, we have updated several source citations and made other small edits. Our project is due in mid-December, so expect to see several larger updates around that time. Thanks! Brooksk32 (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Trying to get nominated as a good article
editHello everyone!
I found this article for a college class I am taking. I am supposed to edit a Wikipedia article relating to art in the Islamic world. I so gladly stumbled upon this page from the Islamic art page. I am wondering if anyone is still currently working to get this article nominated as a good article? Is there any direction/ideas for this page?