Talk:Islay Hill
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elevation
editI could not find a source for an elevation except the GNIS feature page which lists an elevation of 755 feet. It would seem that the Sierra Club referenced this source as it lists the same elevation. Elevations given on the GNIS feature page are not considered to be very accurate in defining the height of mountains. GNIS uses the NED which in this area has a resolution of 1 arc-second (about 30 meters). The topographic map shows no elevation but it can be interpolated using 20 foot contour intervals as being greater than 580 and less than 600 feet. It is reasonable to list the elevation as 580+ ft and this should be considered as sourced information in compliance with Wiki guild lines. --droll [chat] 03:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Islay Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090625183618/http://santalucia.sierraclub.org/ninesis.html to http://santalucia.sierraclub.org/ninesis.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)