Talk:Isotopes of bohrium

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 49.184.195.195 in topic Wording of introduction

bohrium-270

edit

The Wikipedia article for "bohrium" states multiple times that the half-life of bohrium-270 is 61 seconds, but this article and the article for "island of stability" give figures ranging from 30 seconds to 3 minutes. What is the correct figure? Nicole Sharp (talk) 15:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

61 seconds is cited at various places, for example here. But it's been a while, so it may be an old figure. Double sharp (talk) 09:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Still 61 seconds in the latest JWP report. Double sharp (talk) 09:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of bohrium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Isotopes of bohrium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wording of introduction

edit

Artificial element redirects to synthetic element, but, then that article describes artificial being a naturally occurring material that is man-made via indescribable science, where synthetic is an element which we would not find naturally.

Am I being overly pedantic, or reasonably pedantic here?

Signed - Ned Brainard, Medfield College 49.184.195.195 (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply