Talk:It's All Over Now, Baby Blue/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    This artcile is well written and compies sufficiently with the MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The article is well referenced, all on-line sources check out, all appear to be reliable sources, I assume good faith for off-line sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Broad and focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Fair
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Congratulations on a well written, researched article. I couldn't really find any faults. Arguably the prose could do with the odd tweak here and there, but nothing at all serious. Passing as a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: