Talk:It's All Over Now, Baby Blue/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- This artcile is well written and compies sufficiently with the MoS
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The article is well referenced, all on-line sources check out, all appear to be reliable sources, I assume good faith for off-line sources.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Broad and focussed
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Congratulations on a well written, researched article. I couldn't really find any faults. Arguably the prose could do with the odd tweak here and there, but nothing at all serious. Passing as a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: