Talk:It's Not News, It's FARK
 | This article was nominated for deletion on May 27, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Merge with one or both Fark and/or Drew Curtis articles
editI have suggested that this book article be merged with either Fark or Drew Curtis himself. This article reads more like an advertisment than an encyclopedic entry. Please consider merging aspects of this article with one or both of the suggested articles or face deletion. Wikiwisher 05:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is actually common and standard practice to have articles about books on wikipedia. Merger is not necessary and unacceptable in this case. I have removed your tag again. Please do not add it back. Dr. Cash 04:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Wikipedia has pages on many books. If the language seems to have marketspeak then the offended user should rewrite the synopsis. --Pixelface 01:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
fark censorship
editPretty much any negative remarks about Drew's book will get deleted on fark. --Lincoln F. Stern 23:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Duh, Who could have thought Fark.com wouldn't be the best place to criticize it's authors' book? The comments on Fark may well be removed for trolling. 70.80.113.243 22:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)