Talk:It's On Bitch/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 13:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

General overview

Disambiguation links

• Not present.

External links (per Checklinks)

• It denotes one indeterminate-class link, under 'Status', linking to E! Online.

I'm not sure why, but every single reference I use for E! Online, regardless of what article, has this issue. I checked it out and it works on my end, should I just leave it as-is?

You can leave it. prism △ 17:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Usage of files in article

• Two free images that have a vaild rationale.
• One non-free image that has a valid rationale as well.

Original research; reliable sourcing

Production

• The first reference used in that section (cite episode format) is acceptable, though, but not for technical details, I think. Is there any reliable source that names the producers?

There is IMDb, although that's not really considered a reliable source, and unfortunately I can't find another source aside from those two. Would you like me to provide IMDb anyways (since producers don't really seem like information someone can screw up)?

No, it's fine this way. prism △ 17:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Release and reception

• Though probably there aren't many reviews of this episode online, but only Los Angeles Times and Movieline seem reliable. Could you try to find some more reviews?

 Done; I got about three quality reviews (there were several more online, but unfortunately they were all from Examiner.com.)

Prose, redundancies and visual aspect

Plot

• Several redundancies: Remove all instances of the MTV reference except for the one in the last paragraph.

 Done

Production

• Could you please insert {{-}} to prevent the images of overlapping the Reception and release section?

 Done

Release and reception

• "three million viewers April 6, 2009" → missing preposition "on" between "viewers" and "April"?

 Done

Comments

• As usual, the article is well written and there aren't major problems with it, but just look at the things I pointed out above... 13:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Placing on hold as of now. prism △ 13:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Second read-through

• Nothing to further address. Passing, congratulations! prism △ 17:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much! WikiRedactor (talk) 20:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)