This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In "Reception", the Kirkus Reviews review is described as a "starred review". The reference for this article contains no described rating, there is nothing like an X-out-of-Y review, only a "Get it" endorsement. My concern is that the usage of "starred review" here is to insinuate that it is a "five starred review". Although the review from Kirkus is a significantly positive one, it seems like issuable language. I'll defer to someone else for an edit. 2A02:C7C:5C1E:1000:56D:ECD0:A945:729 (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure where you believe that insinuation has been made. It is merely summarizing the context of the review, which clearly indicates the book has been starred by the publication. It also wikilinks to the article where that meaning is described. Not every rating has to be measured in X-out-of-Y terms to be described on Wikipedia. Οἶδα (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
