Talk:Italian Armed Forces

Images for article

• 
• 

--Snek01 01:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Females

This article hasn't referement about the role of women in italian army. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.84.241.3 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Females

The article is unclear of the role of females in the Italian military. It only gives the age ranges for males but it appears to army at least accepts females. The positions of the other branches is unclear Nil Einne 12:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

What's their status for frontline service? Would it be correct to describe a female military pilot as a "fighter pilot"? I'm thinking of Samantha Cristoforetti here in particular. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Military of Italy insigna.jpg

Image:Military of Italy insigna.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not moved yet. The latest discussion at MilHist seems to indicate that this is going to be put to the wider community sometime soon. Any further moves such as these should wait for that community discussion. --Aervanath (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

---

• Various moves including Military of Italy → Armed forces of Italy listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves#6 February 2009 — Over redirect: "Armed forces" means the land army, air force and navy of a country, while "Military", while meaning the same thing, can also refer to just the land army, and thus is ambigious. Per Pervious lengthy discussions on MilHist talk page "Armed forces" is preferable to "Military" in names like this" — Patton^t/c 19:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. Discussion at MilHist is here, here, and here, although there may be more. 199.125.109.126 (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose "Military" is more concise and, quite frankly, more common. Not by much, but still more common. But in part your right. But the reason is simple. "Armed forces" has come into use more recently, when naval and air forces played a much more important role. Over the thousands of years of recorded military history (what? since biblical times?), only recently (the last 500) has naval power really meant so much, and only the last 75 has air power meant so much. And even when naval power came into force, it was not under a unified command with the army, but was often under a separate command structure (hence, the navy had its own ground forces, the marines.) Int21h (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Updating of italian page

Hello. I'm working now on "military of Italy" section editing and modifiyng in wiki.it. The new version will be more accurate and updated to the actual operative situation and national and international legislation. Please, take note of the new contents for a more accurate management of related informations. Regards. --Aeroleo (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --Justin J. Liu (Dylan Smithson) (talk) 19:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Active personnel

Isn't 308.000 units, but 190.000 units —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesare87 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Alpini ISAF.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Alpini ISAF.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 22 August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Italian Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009150602/http://coespu.carabinieri.it/NR/rdonlyres/4F54A33F-675A-4F65-9A59-069F73B1F71E/2085/G8_Action_Plan_EN.pdf to http://coespu.carabinieri.it/NR/rdonlyres/4F54A33F-675A-4F65-9A59-069F73B1F71E/2085/G8_Action_Plan_EN.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170716205703/http://www.esercito.difesa.it/ to http://www.esercito.difesa.it/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)