Talk:Italian agile frog
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Information regarding active plans for conservation.
editI have found a source that has active plans for the conservation of this species. It also includes thorough information about the species and details for threats such as habitat destruction/fragmentation. Areas of conservation and plans for conservation are included. The source should be reviewed, and information should be added to the article accordingly.
https://www.amphibians.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/AP_conservation-Rana-latastei-in-Europe_2005.pdf Mk.josephkim (talk) 04:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): I Bet on Losing Frogs (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Eylul.horozoglu, Britneys99, Sophieeichler.
- Peer reviewed this article, editing to fit the Wikipedia Frog Outline. Britneys99 (talk) 20:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
— Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review
editI added some links with I thought would be helpful. I also fixed some of the grammatical errors and grammatically confusing phrases. The article was well-cited and well-structured so it didn't need much changing structurally. I added in some more information on the conservation of the frogs, using the same source the initial author used. The phrase I added was "The remaining 250 populations were small, isolated, and suffer from loss of genetic diversity."
I also changed some minor sentences, like changing "inundated" with "be inundated by floods" etc. Eylul.horozoglu (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This article is very well structured and well written. I did not add anything because I didn't feel that there were any necessary additions. The categories and subcategories were well divided and the footnotes were well placed and none seemed to be missing. User:Sophieeichler — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophieeichler (talk • contribs) 20:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)