Talk:Italian battleship Regina Elena

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian battleship Regina Elena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Note I'm a Good Article recruiter and am also using this review as a teaching tool for my recruitee. —Ed!^(talk) 01:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this one. —Ed!^(talk) 01:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

• In "design," please link to Ship displacement on first use. In "service history," please link "laid down" "launched" and "commissioned" to their respective articles, too.
  • All linked.
• The displacement in the infobox doesn't match up to what is in the text.
  • Should have been LT in the template, not MT.
• "Regina Elena had a crew of 742–764 officers and enlisted men." -- Does the difference in crew complement depend on if the ship is at regular load or full load?
  • Presumably it's just that the figure changed over the life of the vessel.
• "under the command of Vice Admiral di Brocchetti." -- Does he have a first name?
  • According to this, it's Alfonso.
• "in protest of the Ottoman decision to prohibit Italian post offices in Ottoman territory." -- Is there a wikilink to this event or some more information about it in another article?
  • Nothing I've been able to track down, unfortunately.
• "under the command of Vice Admiral Aubry" -- Again here a first name would be helpful. Also, it isn't clear, does Aubry command this ship, the squadron, the division, or the three sisters?
  • Yup, and he even has a Wiki article (I found it when writing the article on Vittorio Emmanuele and forgot to update this one (and probably the Regina Margheritas need fixing too).
• "the Naval Chief of Staff, Admiral Paolo Thaon di Revel, believed the threat from submarines in the confined waters of the Adriatic was too serious to permit an active fleet policy." -- He's the Italian Naval Chief, right?
  • Yeah, is there anything there that needs to be clarified?
• I spot no duplicate links or disambiguation links. All external links appear to be working. Images all appear to be properly lisenced. I see no problems with article stability and neutrality.

Placing the article on hold pending a few fixes. —Ed!^(talk) 02:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article, Ed. Parsecboy (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Good work. Passing for GA now. —Ed!^(talk) 18:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)