Talk:Italian cruiser Etna

Italian cruiser Etna has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Italian cruiser Etna is part of the Protected cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 1, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
February 13, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

GA Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Etna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	the max speed in the text does not match that in the infobox Fixed the converted bore of the main and secondary guns is in cm in the infobox and mm in the text both now mm suggest a note re: caliber I cribbed this part of the article from the class article, which Sturm wrote - I left his method of just linking to caliber in the text - do you think it still needs the note? I'm pretty relaxed about it, so long as either a note or a link is provided. I prefer the note, because it is explicit, but at GA, the link is okazay with me. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply ~~were~~ carried How about adding a "that" instead? Works for me. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 11:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply the mm conversions of the TT don't match between the text and infobox Fixed ~~The s~~She was protected Good catch suggest adding the conning tower armor to the infobox Added During the First Italo-Ethiopian War... Was hurrying when I was writing that last night - oops! Giovanni Bausan and torpedo boat are overlinked Fixed both
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Both appear fine.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	~~Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed~~ Passing GA, all points addressed.

Add topic