Talk:Italian cruiser Zara

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Italian cruiser Zara article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Italian cruiser Zara has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 9, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Zara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical tweaks that I took care of, the article complies with MOS policies pertaining to grammar, as well as general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article refers to a decent quantity of reliable publications; no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article sufficiently covers all relevant aspects of its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains an unbiased approach to its subject. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since at least late 2013, the article has not been subjected to any form of disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The images used in the article are all freely licensed, suitably captioned, and relevant to the topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article qualifies for GA, based on my analysis. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic