 | Italian ironclad Italia has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 19, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad Italia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ErrantX (talk · contribs) 11:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Happy to review this. Mostly looking good - I have made some copyedits. Also some brief comments:
- Italia was under construction for nearly 10 years; I take it from hints in the article that this is unusually long, anything to add here to note that it was longer than expected
- How does the note I added work?
- building ways; link to Slipway#Ship_construction?
- Sounds good to me.
- Italia was not assigned to either the Active or Reserve Squadrons in 1898, though she took part in the annual fleet maneuvers that year.; so she was with the Reserve squadron till 1898 then de-activated? or something else? It just seemed a bit of a jump.
- It's probably safe to assume that, but it's often very difficult to track down the activities of these old ships. It's quite possible that the ship was deactivated before 1898 and it just wasn't recorded in one of these old journals.
Great article as usual --Errant (chat!) 11:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review! Parsecboy (talk) 13:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ah... It's so annoying when there gaping holes in the records! thanks for looking at those bits. --Errant (chat!) 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Photo
edithere. Parsecboy (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Another here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)