Talk:Italian monitor Faà di Bruno/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • GM 194 was captured by the Germans after the Italian Armistice Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
  • puppet Repubblica Sociale Italiana (Italian Social Republic) that they installed afterwards British afterwards.
  • She displaced 2,854 long tons (2,900 t), with a length between perpendiculars of 55.56 meters (182 ft 3 in) Tonne should be primary here.
    • Many navies continued to use long tons after they went metric because that's how standard displacement was defined
  • She was fitted with four 40-caliber 76.2 mm (3 in) Ansaldo anti-aircraft guns Add an "AA" after "anti-aircraft".
  • water-cooled 40 mm (1.6 in) 40 mm (1.6 in) Vickers-Terni 1915/1917 light AA guns Two 40 mm (1.6 in)s?
    • Ooops.
  • she bombarded Austro-Hungarian positions with little noticeable effect Link Austro-Hungarian.
  • What did she do between August 1917 and 13 November 1924?
    • No idea.
  • What happened after she got decommissioned in November 1924?
    • Kept in reserve, I guess.
  • Genoa is overlinked.
    • the link in the lede is actually to the bombardment, not the city.
  • GM 194 was scuttled in Savona at the end of the war and was subsequently scrapped Why did she scuttled? What happened?
  • No edit wars.

Infobox

  • The displacement isn't the same in both the infobox and the body.
  • The 381 mm gun isn't mentioned in the body.
  • British draught.
    • Dammit

Sources

  • Google Books claim that Brescia's book year was 2013, not 2012. Which one is correct?
    • 2012
  • Gardiner 1992's title should be "The Eclipse of the Big Gun: The Warship, 1906-45".
  • "Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-1922" --> "Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-1921" typo.
  • Ordovini and Trawick ISSNs are the same as the Clerici.
    • ISSNs are for the magazine, not the issue
  • No OR.
  • The rest looks good to me and are reliable and academic.

Images

  • Looks good to me.

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply