Talk:Italian occupation of Corsica

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italian occupation of Corsica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5glwSGGwF?url=http://www.esercito.difesa.it/root/storia/CIL_nembo.asp to http://www.esercito.difesa.it/root/storia/CIL_nembo.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyvio?

[1] Some parts of the article appear to have been lifted verbatim from this website or this [2] Keith-264 (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

The first link to weaponsandwarfare.com is clean. Their blog post is dated 30 September 2015 and includes a verbatim copy of our article from August 2015.[3] From Hill To Shore (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

@Keith-264: I am struggling to spot the text of concern on the second link. However, I am using a smart phone at the moment, which makes searching more difficult. As the second link is dated to May 2015, can you please compare it to our article version of February 2015? From Hill To Shore (talk) 06:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

8 May 2015 As Corsica was still under the sovereignty of Vichy France onwards. Hope this is a lift from us too. I've copy-edited some of our text so some of the similarities aren't as apparent as they were before I realised that chunks of text had been lifted from another source. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Expansion

@Excommunicato: Very good stuff but if I may be permitted one cavil, it's 21 September not 21st September. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 06:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

I fear that I've reached the limit of my sources. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

this is what AI says: "Yes, you are correct. Eisenhower did not want any units engaged in Operation Avalanche to be diverted to Operation Vesuve." maybe the sentence should be linguistically rephrased: "Eisenhower stipulated that no Allied forces engaged in Operation Avalanche, the landings at Salerno (9–16 September) and the French must use their own ships and troops." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.47.141.171 (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)