Mixup

edit

This article seems to have been mixed up with one describing Bruce Hangen. Can someone fix it?


(Sources - IMDB, Sparknotes, My viewing from The Film Schindlers List) ~Joe J.

These don't seem to be appropriate sources, especially "viewing from the film", you can't write a factually correct article based off a film. I've also added the references needed template. Rayward 19:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Neutrality of Article

edit

I am specifically concerned about the phrases:

Stern, like Schindler, was an opportunist, and he was the brains behind the rescue of the Schindlerjuden. Stern was the one who discovered a way to channel his essentially forced labor for Schindler into a way to help his fellow Jews. Schindler did no work, leaving Stern to run the factory.

From my understanding from books as well as the movie, Oskar Schindler was not a mere puppet head, and in fact this article is countered by the Oskar_Schindler Wikipedia article, which states He was a very persuasive individual, and after the raid, increasingly used all his skills to protect his Schindlerjuden (Schindler's Jews).

This article seems to have been written so as to unduly discredit Schindler, regardless of the amount of work which Stern did to save his Schindlerjuden.

  • I removed the POV notice, because the article has now referred parts removed User:Hydrox

More Information

edit

I added some more information, including the date of birth and year of death. The birth was as reported on the list of Schindlerjuden, and the death was from reports of Oskar Schindler's actions at his funeral. Can somebody find more information as to the date of death? I also listed several references for some of the information contained in the main article. Mushrom 2022, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

If Itzhak Stern did infact type the list, WHY did he misspell his own first name in it? [1] Entry #659 on page 8 of the document. Can someone please find out why, and then submit it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.109.194 (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Schindler

edit

The info that Schindler was Nazi is irrelevant in the relation to the fact that Stern was his accountant. --Honzula 11:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Honzula (talkcontribs) 11:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Istak Stern.jpg

edit
 

Image:Istak Stern.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Historical Accuracy

edit

The part about Schindler's List, is accurate for the movie, however, there was no -one- list that Itzhak Stern and Schindler created together. The lists (plural) were a compilation of names that many people (Jews, Nazis, businessmen) wrote down and Schindler decided to hire. It was not a "saving" list to Schindler, more so it was a list to hire people, and get them out of the horrid conditions that they were in, no matter who they were. This is taught in history classes numerous times, and should be fixed here as well, because the movie is not 100% historically accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fizzalie (talkcontribs) 04:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply