Talk:Ivan Andreychin

Latest comment: 2 years ago by PamD in topic Sourcing


Sourcing

edit

I came across this article while stub-sorting because it had been reduced to a stub by the removal of the biography section with the edit summary "No source". But the page was translated from Bulgarian wiki, and has a collection of sources which appear to support the content. It would be more appropriate to tag that section as "Unreferenced" and leave time for the creating editor, or others, to add footnotes to connect the content to the sources. It isn't BLP, and it doesn't even mention what seem to be the controversial circumstances of his death, allegations, etc. All the sources are available online, though the creating editor didn't create online references for them but just translated their titles. The sources in the bu.wiki article appear as:

I don't know Bulgarian but Google Translate suggests that this set of sources is exactly those which currently appear, unlinked, in the article. Someone with knowledge of Bulgarian could format them as proper references and go through the biography adding footnotes to show which source supports which content. It appears that bu.wiki are less demanding of proper referencing than we are. PamD 16:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply