Talk:Ivan Palmaw/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 11:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for nominating this article. I'll have a look and review it. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Initial comments

• There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 21.3% in similarity.
• There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• The article is stable.
• No previous GA reviews.

General comments

• Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
  • "emigrated to" → "immigrated to"
  • "office building" → "an office building"
  • Done. - G
  • I recommend cutting down on the number of "he"'s in the article, and instead replacing it with his surname.
  • Done. - G
• Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  • Optional: I recommend placing both images inside the {{Multiple image}} template.
  • The article is relatively short, so it's alright to leave the text inside one section.
  • The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED. Overall, the lede's length is okay, and it summarises the article, the article has appropriate sections, and there are no biased words in the article.
• Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
  • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
  • No referencing issues.
  • All references are reliable.
    • Wikilink Jeffrey Karl Ochsner as author.
      • Done. -G
    • Ref 5 is missing pages.
      • Fixed. -G
  • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 4–all verify the cited content. AGF on Ochsner.
  • Copyvio already checked.
• Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
  • When did he enroll? If unknown, rephrase the sentence → "He studied military engineering at the Saint Petersburg Imperial University".
    • Fixed. - G
  • Do we know anything about his post-1957 work at Harry Powell & Associates?
    • Sadly not. -G
  • The rest of the article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
• Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
  • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• Checking whether the article is stable.
  • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
• Checking images.
  • Optional: Add a non-free image of Palmaw in the infobox.
    • Done. -G
  • Images are properly licensed.
  • Saint Spiridon Orthodox Cathedral caption → "Palmaw designed the Saint Spiridon Orthodox Cathedral in Seattle".
    • Fixed. - G

Final comments

@Generalissima: The review will be put on hold for a week. Once the issues are fixed, I'll promote the article. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vacant0: Okay! I think I got to everything. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Nice job. Promoting. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.