Talk:Izhorian Museum

Izhorian Museum was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed text

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've removed this text from the article; see the article's history for full attribution.

From "Museum"

Museum regularly hosts different exhibitions,^[1] and participates in «My homeland is Leningrad Oblast» (Russian: Мой родной край — Ленинградская область) federal project.^[2]

References

^ "Ижорская культура из Вистино входит в моду. Репортаж". Kingisepp.ru (in Russian). Кингисеппский городской инфопортал. 2017-07-12. Archived from the original on 2023-01-13. Retrieved 2023-01-14.

^ "Ижорский музей в Вистино привлекает туристов". Kingisepp.ru (in Russian). Кингисеппский городской инфопортал. Archived from the original on 2023-01-13. Retrieved 2023-01-14.

Baffle☿gab 04:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Unsuccessful. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 23:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Izhorian Museum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Красный (talk · contribs) 07:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 04:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I will be reviewing this article soon. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 04:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I truly find it a shame to do so, I am upset that I have to make the decision to quick-fail this nominee, I believe the sourcing issue is not at GA standard at the moment. However, please don't let this discourage you from continuing to work on the article! I respect the time you spent working thru the article you went to this location and photographed yourself. Note that all th other criteria appear to be correct so I am passing them. If you have any questions, just ask on my talk page.

1. The prose is generally good, with content in the lede later cited in the article. I also don't notice any WtW in the article so... Passed.
2. Sourcing is the biggest issue in the article in my opinion, some appear to be blogs or official websites. Local newspapers, self-published websites (with no references section at the bottom) are prone inaccuracy and errors so I unfortunately have to fail this criteria. to I am unable do verify content that have permanent dead link URLs so I am assuming good faith that it's correct.
3. Article is focused. I was unable to find needless detail.
4. Article has no issue of neutrality.
5. Article is stable, no edit wars etc...
6. Article has one image with a verifiable copyright status and a suitable caption. I respect that you took the image yourself.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic

[ikv-1] "Ижорская культура из Вистино входит в моду. Репортаж". Kingisepp.ru (in Russian). Кингисеппский городской инфопортал. 2017-07-12. Archived from the original on 2023-01-13. Retrieved 2023-01-14.

[2] "Ижорский музей в Вистино привлекает туристов". Kingisepp.ru (in Russian). Кингисеппский городской инфопортал. Archived from the original on 2023-01-13. Retrieved 2023-01-14.

[1]

[2]