Talk:Jóhann Jóhannsson

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jóhann Jóhannsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161016172055/http://www.ausersmanual.org/ to http://www.ausersmanual.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jóhann Jóhannsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050216162711/http://www.touchmusic.org.uk/Biographies/johannjohannsson.html to http://www.touchmusic.org.uk/Biographies/johannjohannsson.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091215111822/http://www.this.is/kitchenmotors/ to http://www.this.is/kitchenmotors/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016000035/http://www.beggars.com/us/johannjohannson/index.html to http://www.beggars.com/us/johannjohannson/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Unreliable source?

There seems to be some disagreement about the reliability of this source. User:Kaniinsideout removed it on grounds that the cause of death has never been made publis, and the cited source, BZ, is a "German tabloid known for gossip stories about celebrities". I am inclined to agree with this assessment. However, User:Herr chagall (who I see is an experienced Wikipedia editor) restored the claim together with the same citation, only without offering an explanation. It seems to me this needs to be settled here.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Any suggestion as to how to settle this? There hasn't been a statement from the authorities, his management or family, so until that happens, shouldn't the potential cause of death be left out from the page? —Kaniinsideout 25 July 2018

I inserted the cause of death again with a more reliable source. WDR is a public-broadcasting institution and is usually very reliable. Jinola (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Looks good to me. What say you, Kaniinsideout?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hadn't seen the notification sooner, because I wasn't logged in. While it is correct that BZ is on the tabloid spectrum, in such cases they have their ear close to the (usually unnamed) sources who share the details. Just like other journalists, they have their network of official and unofficial contacts. Take the (admittedly more extreme) instance of TMZ and the stories they broke first. Will readd it as the info provided (cause of death) is correct. Cheers. --esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 12:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

I redacted this cause of death - it's not accurate and I'd agree that tabloids can't be trusted to list facts like this. Many, more solidly reliable news articles have published that the cause of death is unknown. LisaWells5 (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

References

@LisaWells5: The problem with the BBC story is that it's almost seven months older than the Variety story. The BBC can only report on what has been stated at the time; we'd need a BBC story from September or later to go with the claim that the cause is still unknown. —C.Fred (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)