Talk:Jón Gnarr

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 2601:547:500:2650:2CA4:FFAA:69DB:F7BD in topic Patronymic

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Patronymic

edit

The introductory warning does not apply to the name in the article's title. "Gnarr" in not a patronymic but a corruption of the middle name "Gunnar". "Kristinsson" is the patronymic, however. Asgrrr (talk) 21:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The entry now refers to his last name as Kristinsson, which is correct since the national registry doesn't allow for true last names. Last names or family names in Iceland are, technically, middle names. helgihg (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

So how can we change the listing, warning, and ordering? I can't see how to edit the warning. Difbobatl (talk) 13:44, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I changed the hatnote to a footnote. There's no reason for this to be at the top of the article. It's not disambiguation (which is important for navigation and should be seen immediately), it's just a minor stylistic note of little interest to most readers. A footnote is the appropriate place. Designate (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I saw that the hatnote (Template:Icelandic name) was missing and since this is an unusual case I made this:
but at the last minute I noticed the footnote and changed like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J%C3%B3n_Gnarr&diff=559544669&oldid=557341972 but if I'm being overly pendatic just change it but please keep (at least) the comment I added as a reminder. Maybe this case is special since he doesn't really use a patronymic, but it's still an Icelandic name that means Jón (or Jón Gnarr) er preferred to Kristinsson. Do you think a hatnote is not justified in the usual cases also? comp.arch (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I don't think a hatnote is ever the right place to explain a stylistic decision, unless the article can't be understood without it. The top of the article should be as accessible and simple as possible, it should jump immediately to explaining who the person is and get to the details later. Stacking extra content in various colors and fonts is kind of outdated, it goes back to the early 2000s when websites didn't understand design. I'm not sure a footnote is the best place either, but it's less intrusive. There have been a few discussions about this in various locations, but there's not much of a consensus. —Designate (talk) 11:49, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

According to the Allusionist episode 87, https://www.theallusionist.org/allusionist/icelandic-names , this information is incorrect. Gnarr has been accepted by Icelandic courts as a bona fide family name, heritable to Gnarr's descendants. Gnarr is now a part of the minority of Icelanders who do have a family name. Gnarr explains the process himself in the last 10 minutes of the linked podcast. I would edit this myself, but how notes and references are handled is beyond me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:500:2650:2CA4:FFAA:69DB:F7BD (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Official page on Facebook

edit

Would someone kindly add this to the "External Links" section in the main article, when I do it seems to be removed.

  Done Not sure why it would be removed. §FreeRangeFrog 21:19, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comments

edit

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jón Gnarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jón Gnarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jón Gnarr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply