Talk:Jürgen Stroop
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reports
editCould you place copies and information about his reports here?! -unsigned anon user
Death penalty from the allies too, before
editFor the executions of the Allied airmen in Germany. --HanzoHattori 08:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
The "wonderful sight"-quote
edit"In the report, Stroop recalled: 'What a wonderful sight!'" - Where? On page 11 he briefly mentions "der Sprengung der Warschauer Synagoge um 20,15 Uhr beendet".
According to the reference Who Defended The Warsaw Ghetto?, Kazimierz Moczarski didn't quote the report but Stroops spoken words. Hexmaster (talk) 10:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Butchered sentence
editAfterwards, in an elaborately prepared report, now referred to as "The Stroop Report" (it would later be used as evidence at the Nuremberg Trials), originally titled "The Jewish Quarter of Warsaw is no more!" Stevo2001 (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Gestapo vs SS
editThe lead describes him as a high ranking member of Gestapo, while the text details his career in the SS. 173.171.192.180 (talk) 21:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Recent edit
editPreserving here by providing this link; please see edit summary for rationale. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- More of the same; please see diff. The article appears to rely excessively on quotes by the subject from Interviews with the Executioner, which I consider an issue. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale was: "Reducing intricate detail; unneeded section breaks; streamline infobox". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jürgen Stroop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060526200526/http://www.freeman.org/m_online/may03/arens.htm to http://www.freeman.org/m_online/may03/arens.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Boy with hands in air
editThe boy with his hands held high is often used for propaganda purposes but he is known to have become a successful businessman in Britain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.106.78 (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Were the inmates of the getto who shot Stroop's men executed?
editThe conflict began when some of Stroop's men arrived to discover why the workers were not making uniforms as they were contracted to manufacture but instead made more-profitable fur coats. As they arrived Stroop's soldiers were shot. Were the perpetrators executed or were they killed during the conflict that they had initiated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.106.78 (talk) 06:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Infobox image size
editI believe that the aspect ratio of the infobox image in this article is such that presented at the infobox's default value it is too large, the visual equivalent of SHOUTING. I suggest that the current size is more appropriate. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
October 2019 edit
editPreserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "c/e and reducing excessive quotations". --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)