This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The eleven sources provided on the article, by "Joseph Anthony Movshon", also listed as J. A. Movshon, are self-published and do not provide notability per Wikipedia:Notability (academics) or any other notability policy or guideline. The article could be subject to a deletion process, WP:PROD, WP:SOFTDELETE, or WP:AFD, especially if seen to be just a promotion for the institution or just a general listing of academics at the institution. Otr500 (talk) 09:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article could do with improvement, including the sourcing, but the subject is very clearly notable per WP:PROF#C3, and most probably other criteria, so I would not recommend starting an AfD discussion as you would find youself in a very small minority. And don't even think about WP:PROD, as I am already contesting deletion now. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Greetings, my intention is to call attention to BLP's of "professors" that lack sourcing or that is mainly or all self-sourced. Especially when sources like this are either formatted wrong or otherwise appear to be a dead link. Many articles on professors are questionable as per actual notability. If I raise issues and get sensible replies it is either a no-brainer or there is something valid. As one of the 13,500 members of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences but more especially one of the more highly prestigious 2,380 members (and nearly 485 foreign associates) of the National Academy of Sciences created by Abraham Lincoln, there is certainly notability. I missed that when looking down the long list of self-sources. Thanks for your reply, Otr500 (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
