Talk:J. Baird Callicott

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Expert needed

edit

Could someone informed and who has a wide variety of sources work on this article? Also, it would need to be in an encyclopedic format, as many recent edits seem to be more from proponents of this view, displaying Callicott's philosophy as a sort of fact, rather than trying to highlight, in easily accessible and non-esoteric terms, the philosophical arguments he makes. Smeggysmeg 07:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on J. Baird Callicott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply