J. D. Hammer has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 25, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:J. D. Hammer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs) 18:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this article for the June GA Backlog drive. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Overall, prose seems strong and adequate for GA. I have a few pieces of feedback and questions; see below. Forgive my pickyness in place, but that's an indication of the strength of the prose. I also did a couple of copyedits; please revert they're incorrect or if you disagree with them.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- I only randomly checked a few refs, but they seem fine.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- As a non-fan, it's hard for me to say if this bio is broad and focused enough. I suggest that you have another baseball expert take a look at it for that.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Nice job; no overly fan/peacocky language.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No apparent edit warring here.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Only image is in the infobox. Question: is it normal practice to include images of players' stadiums or playing field in their bios? If so, would it be appropriate to do that? I trust that you're making the appropriate decision to include the one image, though, so I won't require it for this GAN.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Nice effort, strong bio, fun to read.
- Pass/Fail:
Prose
College career:
- 1st sentence: ...he struggled to hit the ball.' I don't know much about baseball, but I'm pretty sure this phrase means Hammer didn't do well as a hitter. It's a bit unclear to those of us stupid about baseball, so could you clarify?
- Speaking of, I suggest that you look for jargon, which can plague sports articles. I'll try and look for it myself, but as a non-fan, I'm sure to miss some uses. There's going to some, so please make sure that there are links, something else I wouldn't notice.
- 2nd sentence: the phrase in relief needs to be explained or linked. Could "ERA" also be linked?
- Possibly a really stupid question: Do college baseball seasons have individual articles? If so, they should be linked here, as in "2016 college baseball season".
Philadelphia Phillies:
- 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence: The phrase "by retiring" is unclear. I assume that it means that he struck the three hitters out, but could you clarify?
Second stint with Colorado:
- Last sentence: To my eye, there doesn't seem to ba a space between "Triple-A" and "Albuquerque". It could be just me, but if not, could you put a non-breaking space in-between them?
You're very close. Take care of the picky comments and I'll gladly pass this to GA. Best, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- User:GhostRiver, it's been a few weeks since this review. If there's no response in 7 days (18 July), I will regretfully have to fail this GAN. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Christine. I noticed this review hanging out, and since it seems so close to GA status, I tried to address your feedback. I think I have addressed all of it. On the issue of retiring a batter, it's not necessarily getting a strikeout, but any kind of out. I noticed that in two places, so I added the wikilink to out for the first instance and reworded the second one.
- Good call on linking the college baseball seasons. I had not thought of doing that before, but for NCAA Division I teams, there are links like 2015 NCAA Division I baseball season. I'd be happy to clear up any other concerns. Larry Hockett (Talk) 21:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Larry Hockett, I had forgotten about it, so it's good that you took in on and completed it. I think that now with the changes you made, I can pass this article to GA, and will do so now. Thanks, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)