Talk:JCall

Relevance

Ben Gurion St. is relevant to the context here because of the pro/anti-israeli feelings in europe that prompted this foundation, hence the caveat that most members are from franceLihaas (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Has a reliable source made a connection between the incidents related to Ben Gurion St. and JCall? If not, including it in the article is impermissible synthesis. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

1. that's the call for sources (the point of the fact tag)

2. it's in the "background" section to give context. WP:Bold and WP:Ignore call for editors to be bold w/o fear of political repercussions. Of course that doesnt mean i think its permanent, if nothing is forthcoming in due course (after a perion of some time with the call) then it must be removed.Lihaas (talk) 23:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with "political repercussions"; it has to with WP:SYNTH, part of WP:NOR. It doesn't matter that the incident happened, what matters is whether a RS has connected the incident with JCall. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

as per the tag, if nothing is forthcoming youre right it must go, but give it some time. the page only just hit 1k views.Lihaas (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

uncited material

i saw something that said "citation needed" and i wanted to delete this uncited stuff but the page is protected Tommy has a great username (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)