| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the JUDO (software) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability
editAre you sure this is a notable enough topic for wikipedia? I would not like to see any wasted effort on this article only to see it deleted. By analyzing for this topic I do not think it is notable. It may be hard to maintain it also for its verifiability. If there isn't external reliable sources (the primary source, i.e. project homepage, does not count) this article will pretty much be deleted. Also if it's stand like it is right now, even less than an appropriate stub it will certainly be speed deleted. I think its best to discuss it here in the talk page before tagging the article out of civility ;-) Regards Loudenvier 21:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- http://opensourceschools.org/article.php?story=20030407070253987, http://freshmeat.net/projects/judo/, http://www.video-animation.com/java_001.shtml Choicefresh (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
It is a shame how the Wikipedia project is diminished by randomly putting this marks which "challenge" the article all over the place. In my point of view it is ridiculous to question the project home page as source. I have no idea if this project is worth mentioning, but the article does no harm.
Even more ridiculous is, to put a mark on the article an leave it this was for 2 1/2 years now.
If this is not stopped you could as well redirect the Wikipedia page to Encyclopedia Britannica, where people would never mark their information as worthless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.40.41 (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)