Talk:Jack Burkman
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jack Burkman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia worthy
editNot sure if he qualifies since the whole entry is really based on an incident that was just planned for someone who played on the practice squad for a month.--CharlesDeMint (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Seth Rich
edit"A serial killer is likely behind the murder of North Carolina Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, according to forensic-psychology students and instructors, who spent three months investigating the homicide. Those researchers, who volunteer at the Profiling Project..." "The Profiling Project is funded by GOP lobbyist Jack Burkman, who last September announced he was offering a $100,000 reward for information into Rich’s death."[1] --Guy Macon (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Attempt at discrediting Special Investigation
editIt seems to be all over the news today. Jack Burkman was just accused of trying to drum up false accusations of sexual misconduct as a way of discrediting Mueller's special investigation. [2]. The link isn't the only news story reporting on it. Seems to be credible, and probably encycopedia-worthy for this person. --MarchHare (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Does "credibility" imply that something is true or happened, as opposed to "it seems possible"? (AltheaCase (talk) 03:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC))
Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2018
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove entry for October 30th. It's a lie and completely false. Information to backup. JayFenneman (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: Nothing is or can be a lie there because all allegations are properly attributed. It's widely covered, and you shouldn't engage in original research with your "information to backup". Read WP:NOTADVOCACY for why Wikipedia does not engage in "believing all women" or similar such nonsense when the "woman" doesn't even exist. wumbolo ^^^ 18:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Shot in the butt-ocks
editThis should probably be included. Volunteer Marek 20:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
The Political Activities Section Is Too Large.
editI ask someone with good knowledge & authority (better than mine) to split this section into smaller, more discrete chunks.
Also, I was the one who added the event announced Oct 11, 2019. In the published document there is at present a box around my addition. If anyone knows how to remove this box, please do so!
Thanks Wikipedia! Alpine Joy (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)