Wikipedia worthy

edit

Not sure if he qualifies since the whole entry is really based on an incident that was just planned for someone who played on the practice squad for a month.--CharlesDeMint (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Seth Rich

edit

"A serial killer is likely behind the murder of North Carolina Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, according to forensic-psychology students and instructors, who spent three months investigating the homicide. Those researchers, who volunteer at the Profiling Project..." "The Profiling Project is funded by GOP lobbyist Jack Burkman, who last September announced he was offering a $100,000 reward for information into Rich’s death."[1] --Guy Macon (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Attempt at discrediting Special Investigation

edit

It seems to be all over the news today. Jack Burkman was just accused of trying to drum up false accusations of sexual misconduct as a way of discrediting Mueller's special investigation. [2]. The link isn't the only news story reporting on it. Seems to be credible, and probably encycopedia-worthy for this person. --MarchHare (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Does "credibility" imply that something is true or happened, as opposed to "it seems possible"? (AltheaCase (talk) 03:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC))Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2018

edit

Remove entry for October 30th. It's a lie and completely false. Information to backup. JayFenneman (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: Nothing is or can be a lie there because all allegations are properly attributed. It's widely covered, and you shouldn't engage in original research with your "information to backup". Read WP:NOTADVOCACY for why Wikipedia does not engage in "believing all women" or similar such nonsense when the "woman" doesn't even exist. wumbolo ^^^ 18:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Shot in the butt-ocks

edit

This should probably be included. Volunteer Marek 20:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Political Activities Section Is Too Large.

edit

I ask someone with good knowledge & authority (better than mine) to split this section into smaller, more discrete chunks.

Also, I was the one who added the event announced Oct 11, 2019. In the published document there is at present a box around my addition. If anyone knows how to remove this box, please do so!

Thanks Wikipedia! Alpine Joy (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply