Talk:Jack Du Brul

Latest comment: 6 years ago by SquidPebblePoliceman in topic Political Views

Surname and article title Du Brul

edit

Jack Du Brul, as we call him, has the [Jack DuBrul Forum] where he participates as user Jack Dubrul. On the home page he uses both Jack DuBrul and Jack Dubrul, the latter in his copyright notice. I don't know enough to do more than pass it on FYI.

(It opens, "Welcome to the world of geologist Philip Mercer.") --P64 (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Du Brul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Du Brul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Political Views

edit

I attempted to add a section to this stub article called "Political Views" with the following text:

"Du Brul is notable for incorporating right-wing themes into his novels. For example, in The Lightning Stones, climate change is revealed not to be the consequence of human-generated carbon emissions, but rather the result of a European billionaire exploiting an occult mineral to warm the planet so that his own clean energy companies can profit.[1]"

Another user, however, immediately deleted the entire section. I feel the addition of this section and information is appropriate. Many artists and authors have similar sections on their pages when their political views are notable. Furthermore, Du Brul's seem particularly worth mentioning as they've found their way into his novels. Multiple readers, as illustrated by the reader reviews posted at that Goodreads link, were surprised at the anti-climate-science content -- as well as harsh descriptions of the president and White House officials during the Obama administration -- within what was marketed as an adventure novel.

I could certainly imagine revising or rewording this proposed section, or incorporating more citations. I want to ensure that any mention of Du Brul's politics is itself politically neutral in accordance with Wikipedia standards. But it doesn't seem like an outright deletion was merited.SquidPebblePoliceman (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Reviewing the edit history, I see the explanation provided for the speedy deletion was the use of Goodreads as a source, or at least the fact that in my citation text I listed "Amazon" as the publisher of Goodreads: "Amazon is not a reliable source." I will instead include the Publishers Weekly review of the novel for a citation.SquidPebblePoliceman (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "The Lightning Stones". Goodreads. Amazon. Retrieved 15 October 2018.