Good articleJack Kirby has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 17, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
June 17, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
May 6, 2018Good article nomineeNot listed
June 10, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 21, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jack Kirby created many famous comic book characters including Captain America, but his conception of Spider-Man was rejected for being too heroic?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 28, 2018, August 28, 2022, and February 6, 2024.
Current status: Good article

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Non-neutral phrasing

edit

The article contained an inflammatory, non-neutral phrase: "Several months later, after his split with DC, Kirby began freelancing regularly for Atlas in spite of his lingering resentment of Lee's earlier treatment of him in the 1940s."

This sentence contains a fact — Kirby had resentment of Lee — but then it makes an unsupported claim — that the resentment was because of Lee's "treatment" of Kirby. There is no objective indication that 17- or 18-year-old gofer Lee "treated him" in any particular way. Kirby had unproven suspicions that Lee revealed a secret that, as Ronin Ro states in Tales to Astonish p. 27, "A lot of people knew".

Palsunstar restored this POV phrasing here with the edit summary, "See the 'Partnership with Joe Simon' Section." I did so, and that section said something, cited to the Ro book, that the Ro book does not say. Ro (and other historians, as well as Simon himself in his autobiography) confirm Simon & Kirby were fired. This article said they quit, which is demonstrably wrong, so I changed it. And the passage does not document any "mistreatment" of Kirby by Lee. Here's the passage:

Kirby wondered how Goodman learned of their deal. A lot of people knew about their plans, but Joe Simon remembers that Jack suspected Stan. When Simon told him Stan claimed he had nothing to do with it, Jack replied, 'The next time I see that little son of a bitch, I'm gonna kill him.'

All that is documented is that Kirby resented Lee. Nothing supports a claim that Lee mistreated Kirby or Simon or anyone else. All we can say neutrally is that Jack resented Lee over unproven suspicions. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Archival and current status

edit

I have archived all activity on the talk page prior to 2015, it is available at Talk:Jack Kirby/Archive 1. Etzedek24 (talk) 17:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 22 external links on Jack Kirby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jack Kirby Centennial

edit

This will certainly be a useful resource in the years to come.

Happy reading everyone! Mtminchi08 (talk) 05:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Jack Kirby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jack Kirby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

reference note

edit

I don't have time to do a full GA review right now, but I noticed that some sources (like 31 and 97) list "Evanier, King of Comics, p. 57", but others (37, 42, and 146) only list the name and page. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Personal life" section

edit

I've created a "Personal life" section, as we have in virtually all autobiographical articles and so an apparently noncontroversial edit. It was especially needed here, since looking up details such as where he lived and who his children are required extensive combing through a very long article. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

adulatory appellation

edit

Known as 'the King'?? I never read any of his comics growing up in the 1950's and early 1960's. In fact, I don't recall ever even seeing one. Where in the U.S. was he big? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.249.146.8 (talk) 00:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Early Life

edit

Early Life, sentence 3, first word should be Kirby. 173.79.240.107 (talk) 03:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done, thanks. StonyBrook babble 12:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography seems capricious

edit

While I realize we cannot and should not have a full bibliography on this page, the conditions for inclusion in the biography -- mid-career runs at two specific publishers of a certain length - seems arbitrary. While Jack certainly did important work at that time, plenty of work outside of that is worthy of note (Captain America and romance comics didn't just create themselves), and the very fact that Jack aligned himself with emergent publishers like Pacific and Eclipse is of significance.

I don't have the ideal set of metrics to apply, but even just going for, say, his 20 longest runs would be better than this. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

In the first paragraph what is meant by "editorial viva Hitler"?

edit

Is it vandalism, a weird typo,...? 66.69.51.89 (talk) 02:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It was vandalism placed today; it was online for less than 2 hours before being reverted. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 03:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply