Talk:Jack Ross (writer)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Autobiography?
editAt least 2/3 of the sources this page are from the subject's publishers or the subject's employer.
The main editor of this article seems to be Johnmackenzieross. Is this the subject. The page's creator, ThePoem looks to have been warned several times for Conflict of Interest.
The article has been judged as probably notable. You all need to step back. Have faith that other editors will contribute to the article. Writing an Autobiography is not considered good form at Wikipedia. Tipstaff08 (talk) 03:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
NPOV
editAll praise and no criticism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tipstaff08 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I've tried to restore some balance to the critical extracts, as well as adding some references to more recent works. Tusital (talk) 17:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)