Talk:Jagdgeschwader 54
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WP:MILHIST Assessment
editWhy are there no references cited for this, or many of the other Luftwaffe wings articles? LordAmeth 18:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:JG 54 Emblem.gif
edit
Image:JG 54 Emblem.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Major Albert Blumensaat
editYou have as Group Cdr I/JG 54 "Major Albert Blumensaat, 10 January 1940 - 5 February 1940". I doubt this as http://www.ww2.dk/articles/grupkj.htm has him still as Hauptmann and Group Cdr IV./JG 2 from 10.1939 - 22.06.1940. Wschroedter (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Unsourced (apparently) original research
editI'm preserving this material by providing this link. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- More in today's edit; preserving here by providing this link. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- More: [1]. My rationale was: "c/e for concision; npov; reducing uncited intricate detail unlikely to be available in secondary RS". --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)