Talk:Jahanpanah/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of August 15, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass; Rather good, perhaps on FA, the lead could use a bit of servicing.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail, for now. Improve references in the sections: "Other notable structures" and "Bijay Mandal."

3. Broad in coverage?: Fail, for now. I'd like a major improvement to the etymology section.

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass A bit much. Cut a few.

The article is a pass if these changes are made.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 04:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply