This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Neutral?
editThis article is writen like an add for the company and their products. There should be an rewriute with a proper citiation of all sources. --131.220.46.91 (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. All this stuff with words like "vision", "innovator" etc. used makes the bias glaringly obvious, is there a way to report this? 220.225.80.138 (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2011 (UTC)