Talk:Jake Lang
Add topicThe contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liberal bias?
[edit]I noticed how my recent edit got reverted and I am wondering what can be done to remove the liberal bias from the page. Any ideas? ~2026-15307-71 (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- How about instead of political buzzwords you identify a specific problem you'd like to discuss? AusLondonder (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
White supremacist
[edit]The IP editor appears to be correct about lack of adequate sourcing. The two sources substantiating that claim are a blog from a Maddow Show producer and a single news story from NBC. I don't think that's close to enough to label a living person a white supremacist. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- CC @The Green Star Collector, @AusLondonder, @JeffSpaceman, @Joyous!. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Note that I've removed the content per WP:BLPREMOVE and it should not be restored until there's consensus. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- What part of BLPREMOVE applies here? WP:NBC is considered a reliable source. If "white supremacist" is considered unacceptable for BLPs how can we have a whole category tree Category:White supremacists? What sources would you consider sufficient? AusLondonder (talk) 23:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- BLPREMOVE #1. It is poorly sourced because it is sourced to the producer of a news opinion program and a primary source news article that doesn't cover the subject in depth. And, in addition to BLPREMOVE, there's MOS:LABEL, which says that contentious labels "are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution". voorts (talk/contributions) 23:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Here's Lang doing a Nazi salute outside a Jewish organisation while he warns "White people in America, you will be replaced, and your children will be Black Muslims if you don’t stand up now" but mainstream media reporting that he's a white supremacist is "contentious material"? I suggest reading his full comments at that article which I won't repeat here. AusLondonder (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I have read the article and know about Lang, and I think his words and actions speak for themselves, but calling him a "white supremacist" in wikivoice is contentious and our PAGs make clear that we need several reliable sources to use such a label.(Found another part of BLP that applies, WP:BLPSTYLE, which says "Do not label people with contentious labels ... unless a person is commonly described that way in reliable sources." voorts (talk/contributions) 23:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- All you need to do to restore the content is find several more sources that use that term to describe him. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Here are some additional sources which refer to Jake Lang as a "White Supremacist" or "alleged White Supremacist":
- 1) https://www.nyc.gov/mayors-office/news/2026/03/statement-from-mayor-zohran-kwame-mamdani-on-protests-outside-of
- 2) https://www.mcall.com/2026/03/08/ied-tossed-at-jake-langan-at-gracie-mansion-anti-islam-protest-was-operational-nypd/ ~2026-13399-37 (talk) 12:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- The press release shows Lang being referred to as a white supremacist by Mamdani, not a reliable source itself. The other source refers to Lang as "an alleged white supremacist", which is not the same as explicitly describing him as a white supremacist. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I have read the article and know about Lang, and I think his words and actions speak for themselves, but calling him a "white supremacist" in wikivoice is contentious and our PAGs make clear that we need several reliable sources to use such a label.(Found another part of BLP that applies, WP:BLPSTYLE, which says "Do not label people with contentious labels ... unless a person is commonly described that way in reliable sources." voorts (talk/contributions) 23:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Here's Lang doing a Nazi salute outside a Jewish organisation while he warns "White people in America, you will be replaced, and your children will be Black Muslims if you don’t stand up now" but mainstream media reporting that he's a white supremacist is "contentious material"? I suggest reading his full comments at that article which I won't repeat here. AusLondonder (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- BLPREMOVE #1. It is poorly sourced because it is sourced to the producer of a news opinion program and a primary source news article that doesn't cover the subject in depth. And, in addition to BLPREMOVE, there's MOS:LABEL, which says that contentious labels "are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject, in which case use in-text attribution". voorts (talk/contributions) 23:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- What part of BLPREMOVE applies here? WP:NBC is considered a reliable source. If "white supremacist" is considered unacceptable for BLPs how can we have a whole category tree Category:White supremacists? What sources would you consider sufficient? AusLondonder (talk) 23:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Taking out "politician"
[edit]Lang hasn't raised much money for his campaign, and the JVH article sourced in the article says the campaign's not considered serious. Could we take out the term "politician" for him in the intro? Shelter3 (talk) 00:59, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Is the DOJ a reliable source ?
[edit]I see it has been added as one recently. Is it appropriate ? ~2026-20359-12 (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jake Lang is NOT a politician ~2026-32066-77 (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Minneapolis
[edit]In the citation number 17, the article says that Jake plead not guilty for that charge, but the entry says, "plead guilty". Which confused me because later in the article it says that there's an upcoming trial date, not sentencing date, but "trial" date. ~2026-34576-04 (talk) 03:05, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- It appears that the change happened 12 March 2026. It may have just been a mistake, happening when "pleaded" was replaced with "plead" and the next word, "not", was dropped. I've restored "not guilty".-- Pemilligan (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 August 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to the Militancy and Political Career section under August 2026:
On August 17, 2026, Jake Lang staged an anti-Islam protest in Dearborn, Michigan. Dubbed the “Christian Crusader March,” the rally attracted Nazi sympathizers and Christian nationalists. 22 protesters were arrested by local police.
Sources: https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/dearborn-protest-arrests-jake-lang-christian-crusade.amp ~2026-45591-91 (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Already done DrOrinScrivello (talk) 12:58, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jake lang is a Zionist Jew, Not a Christian. He kissed the wall in may of 2017 when he was 21 years old. ~2026-45938-60 (talk) 07:53, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Anything along these lines is going to need a source, though. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:47, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2026 (2)
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the two “!!” in the “ban all Muslims!!” ~2026-46046-16 (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
Not done. This doesn't appear in the article. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:00, 23 August 2026 (UTC)- If this was meant to refer to the quotation "ban Islam!!", I have removed the exclamation points because they do not appear in the cited source nor in any other source that I could find. -- Pemilligan (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "is an American far-right activist and political candidate" to "is an American far-right extremist and political candidate". ~2026-46125-86 (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
Not done: Besides the fact that you haven't cited any sources to support this, Wikipedia generally avoids the use of contentious labels like "extremist" to describe people. See MOS:LABEL. Day Creature (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of politicians and government-people
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested photographs in the United States
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- Wikipedia requested images of politics
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles



