Talk:Jam session

Latest comment: 4 years ago by CAPete in topic Blues Jam

Cypher?

edit

The lead gives "cypher" as an alternative to "jam session"; I can find no other reference or usage for this term outside some mentions of "cipher" as a hip-hop event (which even then seems not to have become general usage). I am going to remove this word from the lead; if someone can come up with an informed way to mention the term elsewhere in the article feel free. Jgm (talk) 13:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The first few paragraphs are a bit off putting. I am sure that the first and most accurate meaning of "Jam Session" is the musical version. The first couple of paragraphs should be put in a different article. As a matter of fact, I cry Shenanigans on the first several paragraphs. Seems like a bit of tomfoolery to me...63.167.255.151 (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Whole article just seems to be examples of bands that play improvised music. It does not explain how the term "jam" arose or provide any background on when the term was first used. Really, the whole thing could get reorganised into a list of jam bands awaiting a much improved entry for "jam" itself. 188.220.56.222 (talk) 09:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Blues Jam

edit
  • "Jam Session" is used in non-jazz contexts too (I play in old-time and bluegrass jams -- and in fact the Wikipedia photo is of a bluegrass jam). But the description (and apparently the "WikiProject Jazz" context?) seems overly jazz focused for the general term. The description text could easily be generalized, but I'm not sure what to do about the project aspect. The various kinds jam sessions don't seem to me to be different enough to justify separate articles, so I suggest generalizing the text, and NOT connecting the resulting article to the "WikiProject Jazz" project.

CAPete (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC) CAPeteReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jam session. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply