Talk:James A. Garfield Monument

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on James A. Garfield Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100225200657/http://www.kittytours.org:80/thatman2/search.asp?subject=101 to http://www.kittytours.org/thatman2/search.asp?subject=101

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:James A. Garfield Monument/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 03:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: MallardTV (talk · contribs) 16:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): The article is incredibly well written in all aspects, however I find the Biography section to almost be too long and stray away from the purpose of the article, perhaps a link to the main article for his bio would be useful. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is well cited to reliable sources. However, it could benefit from some additional ones. It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: The article stays on topics for the most part and is neutral and unbiased. The one thing is as I mentioned earlier the bio section. It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): The images are certainly useful and I feel there are plenty.
Overall: Pass/Fail: Overall, I feel this meets all the criteria for a good article!
· · ·

Garfield Circle

Should Garfield Circle redirect to this page?

Also, the opening sentence says "The James A. Garfield Monument stands on the grounds of the United States Capitol in the traffic circle at First Street and Maryland Avenue SW..." Should we change this to "The James A. Garfield Monument stands on the grounds of the United States Capitol in Garfield Circle, a traffic circle at First Street and Maryland Avenue SW..." or similar? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

I've made the changes. APK hi :-) (talk) 04:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 12:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)