Talk:James A. Ryder/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dweller (talk · contribs) 10:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


I'm going to start reviewing this article, slowly. Please bear with me. My comments will be numbered to aid responses. Happy new year to all. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Dweller: Thank you. I appreciate your undertaking the review. Ergo Sum 16:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
  1. "Society of Jesus" I know that means Jesuits but because the first mention of it is piped from Jesuit, the second mention is unexplained and unwikilinked, so a reader without knowledge won't understand it
    Linked Society of Jesus. Ergo Sum 16:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
  2. "as well as the formal incorporation by Congress" no idea what that means. Which Congress? The observatory had a Conggress? The university had a Congress? The United States Congress? And what are the unspecified Congress incorporating and what are they incorporating that thing into?
    Clarified. Ergo Sum 16:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
  3. According to the wikilink, the diocese of Boston is a geographical construct, so was the college physically moved? If so, it's weird for it to be moved to a relgious body, rather than a place
    Dioceses are legal corporations just like General Motors, so they own property and have employees, etc. So from the perspective of the civil law, they have no geographic boundaries. However, from the perspective of canon law, they have very carefully defined geographic boundaries that they operate within. Ergo Sum 16:10, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Early life
  4. tbc --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 12:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dweller: Have you had an opportunity to give the article another look? Ergo Sum 02:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Comments - Ergo Sum, I agreed with Dweller that I'd take this on while he's busy. So, the usual pedantry:

That's all I have, hopefully some of it is of use. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 14:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Thank you for yet another thorough review. Ergo Sum 03:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Looks very good to me, so happy to promote. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 12:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.