Talk:James Bidlack
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 19 December 2021. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Bidlack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
COI due to Autobiographical editor user:Bidlack
editThis article has been created by, and heavily written and edited by the subject of the article itself. I have removed the excessive citations per WP:RESUME and removed WP:PUFFERY to assume neutral language. If the subject of the article edits this page in the future please be sure to scrutinize the neutrality and WP:GNG of any included material. --Tautomers(T C) 03:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Bidlack: please understand that editing your own wiki page represents a conflict of interest and that wikipedia is not a résumé. It is important to retain neutral language, and excessively promotional language is discouraged. I would encourage you to please stop editing your own wiki page except for information that is blatently factually incorrect, and allow others to assess and assume what is relevant for wikipedia. Also cc'ing user:Russ Woodroofe and user:Phil Bridger since they have recently edited the page as well. --Tautomers(T C) 22:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply (from Bidlack) to Reviewers: Thank you! I thought we were supposed to edit these great Wikipedia Articles for better accuracy (who better than the subject himself for accuracy) and really appreciate how you all have been helping. You did GREAT! I'll leave it alone for now and will follow instructions more carefully - especially keeping this information neutral and stick to the facts. HOORAY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bidlack (talk • contribs) 22:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Bidlack: the best way for you to engage with the article is to request edits (or provide sources) here on the talk page. Editing an article on yourself directly is discouraged, for lots of good reasons -- I'm sure you've read some of the policies, guidelines, and essays that we've linked. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)