Talk:James Cotterill
Latest comment: 17 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic WikiProject class rating
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reaction to sentencing
editThis section only contains negative reactions, all of which are from the same source. It also contains the bizarre, contradictary statement "It happens every week in the Premiership and he was made a scapegoat because he was on TV.", which makes no sense because every Premiership match is shown on television. I think that if no balancing statements can be found then this section should be removed from the article, especially as it contains no facts, just opinions. Gasheadsteve 14:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- I unquoted the scapegoat on TV part of the quote and can I say these are NOT my views on the incident and I tried to get reactions from both sides, but the only reaction I got was from the NW Evening mail, i'm not sure that there is any comments supporting his sentence, but is there is, please add them but do cite your sources. Kingjamie 19:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've had a quick look around and I haven't been able to find any positive comments, all of the parties involved have been keeping quiet. I'll rename the section to Criticism of sentencing to reflect the nature of the comments, so that it's clear it's negative opinions rather than a balanced discussion. Gasheadsteve 22:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)