Talk:James Haven

Notability

This entry was previously deleted because the subject did not meet the criteria for inclusion. Simply having a famous sibling, and father does not merit inclusion. Haven has no notable achievements and his film roles and involvement are obscure at best. Since the page was re-posted, no significant changes in Haven's "notability" have taken place, not has the page provided any substantiative support or citation that this has changed in any way at all. (24.62.100.251 (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC))

File:JamesHaven.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:JamesHaven.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on James Haven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080605074113/http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/health/main.jhtml?xml=/health/2001/10/02/fmjoli02.xml to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/main.jhtml?xml=/health/2001/10/02/fmjoli02.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Haven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161110121918/http://www.wutheringjolie.com/nuke/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=449 to http://www.wutheringjolie.com/nuke/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=449
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.style.com/vogue/feature/032602/page2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Haven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930142820/http://www.sunyjcc.edu/node/9810 to http://www.sunyjcc.edu/node/9810

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Kissing his sister

AS far as I know, the only reason most people know James Haven exists is because the inevitable "scandal" that the tabloids cooked up when his famous sister kissed him on the lips at the Oscars and said "I'm so in love with my brother right now" (because obviously that can ONLY mean a statement of incestuous romance and nothing else...). That would seem to me the primary reason for considering this individual notable, and the primary reason for anyone looking him up. Yet it says nothing t all about it on here. How is this?

64.222.91.167 (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)