Talk:James Joseph Duane
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"the weekly standard criticized it" (dubious)
edit"..., but The Weekly Standard criticized it."
No; one reference is to a weblog, which is an opinion piece by Jamie Sneider. The other reference is broken. There is no citation for this claim (which is probably wrong: the opinion piece was misconstrued as a real article). I'll add a {{ dubious }}.--86.14.247.56 (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
I've cleaned up the citation to the Sneider opinion piece, but I am not sure it even belongs here. It does not seem to me that an article on Prof. Duane ought to include arguments on Duane's views; those probably belong elsewhere. But what would a subject line for an article on talking to the police be? — Raven Onthill (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
On further reflection, I have simply removed the Sneider cite. This whole article is about what Prof. Duane has written, and has little about Duane's biography, which seems to me more relevant to a biographical piece. Raven Onthill (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)